Crime XXXXXXXXVII – Assault IX
3. The
act must be unlawful or in order for an act to constitute an assault it (the
act) must be unlawful.
In
R v Larkin (1942) the accused was brandishing a razor intending to frighten his
mistress’s lover in the presence of his mistress. His mistress, who was drunk
at the time, stumbled while the accused was brandishing the razor and her
throat was cut. The woman died as a result. The accused was tried and convicted
for constructive manslaughter and the defense appealed.
It
was held that the fact that there was an assault directed at his mistress’s
lover i.e. to put him in fear of his life, was an unlawful act and it was
sufficient to establish constructive manslaughter. The act need not be directed
at the victim.
In
R v Arobekieke (1988) the accused was chasing a victim and the latter ran
into a train station and got on board a stationary train. The accused peered
into the carriage doors in search of the victim and the victim, in fear, jumped
out off the train and onto to the railway tracks and was subsequently
electrocuted. The accused was arrested, charged and convicted of constructive
manslaughter or unlawful act manslaughter. The accused appealed.
The
appeal was allowed and the conviction was quashed. While the victim was in
fear; the actions of the accused were not unlawful. Peering into the open doors
of a stationary train may instill fear in the passengers but the act in itself
is not unlawful.
It
was further held that while the victim did apprehend an imminent danger or was
in fear for his safety, the actions of the accused was not sufficient to
constitute an assault.
·
It is also not an assault if the victim
is acting in self defense for example when a would be victim is abusive towards
his or her attacker to prevent some harm from coming to him or her and
·
When one party is abusive towards
another to prevent a crime.
Copyright
© 2019 by Dyarne Ward
Comments
Post a Comment