Crime CL-Insanity VII
With
regards to sugar levels in the body, it can be divided into two categories.
They are as follows: -
1)
Hypoglycemia (a lack of glucose in the body). Hypoglycemia is caused by
external factors i.e. the defendant not doing something he should be doing or
doing something that he shouldn’t be doing. In such instances, depending on the
facts, the defense can raise the defense of automatism
and
2)
Hyperglycemia (excess sugar in the body). Hyperglycemia is a condition that
occurs naturally and it is caused by internal factors. In such instances, the
defense can raise the defense of insanity
In
R v Quick (1973) the defendant a male nurse who was a diabetic had taken
insulin without consuming any food, and in addition to that had consumed
alcohol which aggravated the situation (whisky and rum). He assaulted a patient
who was a paraplegic and inflicted injuries that included a broken nose and a
black eye.
The
defendant was charged under s.47 of the Offences Against Person Act (1861) and
the trial judge directed the jury on insanity (automatism that arises
naturally). He was convicted and he appealed.
The
appeal was allowed and the conviction was quashed. The defendant was suffering
from automatism that arose from a failure to consume food after taking insulin
or taking excessive insulin and his condition was further aggravated or
exacerbated by the fact that he’d been drinking.
It
was automatism that arose from external factors i.e. a failure to do something
that is required or doing something that the defendant shouldn’t be doing given
his condition and the type of automatism that the defendant suffered from fell
under the category of intoxication.
Copyright
© 2019 by Dyarne Ward
Comments
Post a Comment