Crime CXXVII – Intoxication III
If the defendant either drinks (alcohol) or takes drugs to
fortify his courage or to give him “dutch courage” then regardless of whether
the crime that is committed is a basic intent crime or a specific intent crime
he would not be able to rely on the fact that he was intoxicated at the time
and did not have the mens rea to commit the crime as a mitigating factor to
reduce the severity of the act.
In Attorney-General of Northern Ireland v Gallagher (1961)
the accused had a violent twist to his personality and often acted in a
deranged manner, especially after he had consumed alcohol and was particularly
violent towards his wife.
The accused spent some time in a mental institution, for
which he blamed his wife and upon release he made up his mind to kill her.
However, in order to work himself into a fit or to have the courage to kill his
wife, he drank down a bottle of whisky, and once he had reached the level of
intoxication where he was deprived of his senses, he killed his wife with a
knife and a hammer. The accused was charged and convicted of murder. He
appealed on the grounds that at the time he committed the act he was deprived
of his senses and sought to raise the defense of insanity.
The House of Lords upheld the conviction, in that, at the
time he formed the intention to kill his wife, he was in full control of his
senses and therefore the act of killing his wife was premeditated and it was done
with malice aforethought. The fact that he needed to consume alcohol to acquire
the courage to kill his wife does not mitigate the act in anyway.
Copyright © 2019 by Dyarne Ward
Comments
Post a Comment