Crime CCXVII-Theft XXV
In
DPP v Gomez (1993) the defendant colluded with two others who had stolen a
couple of cheques to purchase goods in the shop that he worked in. The
defendant persuaded the manager of the shop to accept the cheques as payment
for the goods the other two had purchased.
The
cheques were dishonored and the defendant was charged. The defendant argued
that the manager had consented to accepting the cheques as payment. The
defendant appealed under section 3 (2) of the Theft Act 1968 which reads as follows:
-
“Where
property or a right or interest in property is or purports to be transferred
for value to a person acting in good faith, no later assumption by him of
rights which he believed himself to be acquiring shall, by reason of any defect
in the transferor’s title, amount to theft of the property”
The
House of Lords upheld the conviction and decided that appropriation could occur
even when there is consent especially when there is a clear intention to
defraud the rightful or legal owner.
Furthermore,
as per section 3 (2) of the Theft Act 1968 for there to be a legal transfer of
title both parties need to be acting in good faith and in this instance neither
the defendant nor those he was colluding with were acting in good faith.
Copyright
© 2019 by Dyarne Jessica Ward
Comments
Post a Comment